BenefitsExpert
Home › About › Editorial standards
Editorial standards

How we write and check our guides

People use our guides for claims that affect their income, so getting the facts right comes first. This page explains who is responsible for them, where our facts come from and what to do if you spot a mistake.

Last updated 24 September 2026. These standards apply to Benefits Expert and to our brand sites: PIPexpert, ESAexpert, ADPexpert, AttendanceExpert and EHCPhelp.

Who is responsible for our guides

Benefits Expert and its brand sites are run by Karol Slusarczyk, the founder, who is responsible for everything we publish. The same person who is responsible for the guides also reads the support inbox, so questions from claimants feed straight back into what we publish.

Karol is not a solicitor, a doctor or a DWP employee. Our guides are general guidance, not legal, medical or financial advice. Where someone needs advice about their own case, especially for an appeal or a tribunal, our guides point to free, regulated help such as Citizens Advice, local welfare rights services and disability charities.

Where our facts come from

We take rates, rules and deadlines only from official sources, mainly these:

We read support groups and messages from claimants to understand what people find hard. We never treat them or other benefit websites as a source for a rate or a rule.

How we check facts

How we write

Independence

How to report an error

If you think something on any of our sites is wrong or out of date, please tell us. Email support@benefitsexpert.co.uk with the page address and what you think is wrong. A link to the official source helps but is not required.

We aim to reply within 2 working days. If we have got something wrong, we correct the page.

Guidance only

Our guides and tools are general guidance, not legal, financial or medical advice. For advice about your own claim, contact Citizens Advice, a local welfare rights service or a disability charity.

Related pages